Nike Shoes Dunk Flyknit Casual Mens Shoes Nike White Black Grey 917746-100 f2532a

Nike Shoes Dunk Flyknit Casual Mens Shoes Nike White Black Grey 917746-100 f2532aNike Shoes Dunk Flyknit Casual Mens Shoes Nike White Black Grey 917746-100 f2532aNike Shoes Dunk Flyknit Casual Mens Shoes Nike White Black Grey 917746-100 f2532aNike Shoes Dunk Flyknit Casual Mens Shoes Nike White Black Grey 917746-100 f2532aNike Shoes Dunk Flyknit Casual Mens Shoes Nike White Black Grey 917746-100 f2532aNike Shoes Dunk Flyknit Casual Mens Shoes Nike White Black Grey 917746-100 f2532a

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and un item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Authenticity: 100% Authentic Guaranteed
MPN: 917746100 Return Address: Domestic Return For U.s. Customers
Style: Athletic Sneakers US Shoe Size (Baby & Toddler): Us 2c ~ 10c
Width: Medium (d, M) US Shoe Size (Youth): Us 10c ~ Us 7y
Material: Synthetic US Shoe Size (Women's): Us 5 ~ Us 12
Color: White US Shoe Size (Men's): Us 7 ~ Us 14
Country/Region of Manufacture: Vietnam Brand: Nike
Pattern: Solid
January 10, 2018

Nike Shoes Dunk Flyknit Casual Mens Shoes Nike White Black Grey 917746-100 f2532a

Back to Blog


Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Rockport WWT83W 'Fisherman Style' Shoe Open Breathable Womens Size 7,Genuine CONVERSE All-star with studs Sneakers Sheos White(Gold)Mr/Ms **DNKY Casual Shoes Mens** excellent quality Elegant style value,MERRELL Boys or Mens Tammarack Moc Weatherproof Shoe Black Suede Size 9 New,Adidas Mens Adilette Shower Locker Slide Shoe Water Sandal Color Choice AQ17Men's/Women's FAGUO Hosta Leather Beige Marine quality King of quantity best seller,Lacoste Bayliss Vulc 317 White Navy Men's Leather Sneaker 34CAM0009042Crevo Wallin Brown Slip On FlipFlop Sandals Sz 7-M,New Men's Paul Smith Yellow Nastro Basso Sneaker Sz 10 US Rare FREE SHIP!,adidas Outdoor BB0962-8.5 outdoor Mens Terrex Agravic Vista,Soft Science Comfort Footwear~Skiff Canvas Flip Flop~11 Colours~Unisex~RRPReef Men's Twinpin Prints Flip Flop, Khaki, Size 6.0,Gourmet Rossi Cactus 100280-BLKCAC Black White Leather Casual Shoes Medium Men,650$ Tod's Brown Moccassino Formale Suede Loafers Size US 13.5 Made In Italy,Valentino Garavani men's sneakers NY2S0830 22B white blue,Men's Clarks Tor Collection Prangley Walk Plain Oxford British Tan 26123256sperry top-sider essex venetian black men's shoe slip on sts10204 leatherCOLE HAAN COLLECTION Vtg Mens Oxfords Size 11.5M Black Leather Stitching Italy,Robertt Botticelli Brown Suede Leather Wingtip Oxford Shooes Size 10 Vibram Sole,asics Japan Onitsuka Tiger MEXICO 66 DELUXE SH D7R2L white made in JapanBrand New Mens Brown Teva Mush II Canvas Flip Flops, Size 7Dunham Burlington 9 Extra Wide Brown Waterproof Oxford,Emporio Armani Sneaker Sz. 43 Leather Man Beige X4X220XL187-A001 MAKE OFFER,Steve Madden Mens Mastic White Slide Sport Sandals Shoes 7 Medium (D) BHFO 6460,Mens Puma Black/Red Size 9 Slides (1T),UNITED ARROWS Men's Shoes 168505 GreenxMulticolor 42,**Reef Casual Sandals - Men's Size Unknown - Black/Brown,Men Women Water Shoes Sandals Summer Slip On Slippers Beach Aqua Big Size,To Boot New York - Suede Oxford - Lug sole - Brown - SZ 11,NIKE Men's Shoes 395824 Grey 28cm,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

New Men's ECCO Soft 7 Perforated Tie Sneakers Size 45 (US 11-11.5),


Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902


Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit


Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:


You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.