Skechers Harsen - Acton Oxford Black Blk Mens Sneaker Oxford Acton Size 11.5M 3bc5be

Skechers Harsen - Acton Oxford Black Blk Mens Sneaker Oxford Acton Size 11.5M 3bc5be
January 10, 2018

Skechers Harsen - Acton Oxford Black Blk Mens Sneaker Oxford Acton Size 11.5M 3bc5be

Back to Blog


Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

LNIB Maison Martin Margiela Vintage Replica MMM Brown Patina Leather Sneakers 10,Man/Woman versace men sneakers Best-selling worldwide Carefully selected materials International big name,OLUKAI Nohea Moku Shoe - Men's Black/Black 11,Adidas Originals Adi Sun Mens Designer Thong Flip Flops Holiday Sandals White,Hogan men's low top sneakers shoes in camouflage fabric Size US 6.5 - ½,Converse Chuck Taylor All Star 70 HI Dark Burgundy Red Hi Sneaker 161478C,Allen Edmonds Enfield Burgundy Cordovan Kiltie Tassle Men's Loafers 10C USA MadeVT1402 Vass WHOLECUT - Black Calf - US 8 - U Last,Pacard Men's Slippers, Low Shoe Brown, NEW,TEVA Brown Nylon, Gladiator Strap Sport Sandals. Men's 11,Givenchy Leather High-Cut Sneakers 41 Value Under (99915,New Mens Summer Leather Sandals Outdoor Beach Shoes Hiking Closed Toe ShoesSAMPLE NIKE AIR BAKIN OG SZ 9 white navy hardaway rodman 1997 vintage rare le,Men's/Women's Vass Dress Shoes --Blk Leather (88391 Adequate supply and timely delivery Low price Complete specifications,Tommy Hilfiger Mens Aldez Boat Shoe- Select SZ/Color.,asics Japan Onitsuka Tiger MONK 1183A024 White × WhiteMr/Ms Nike men's shoes (casual-sporty) Charming design Impeccable renewed on time,Rockport Mens Black Sport Sandals Size 10 (E, W) (407992)JOHNSTON MURPHY Mens Optima Comfort Black Cap Toe Style 22-02985 Size 12D,Daniele Alessandrini Moccasin Shoes Sz. 44 Man Brd F368KL1623606-14 PUT OFFER,New Havaianas 2016 Minions Flip Flops Black or Yellow - All SizesHunter For Target Men's Slides Striped Slide Sandals Blue White Slip On Size 11,Adidas Yeezy Powerphase Calabasas Black US 8,Havaianas Star Wars Flip Flops Yoda Darth Vader NWT men's 11/12 NEW,VALENTINO men shoes Black suede fabric leather Soul AM sneaker NY0S0A40 LRQ 0NO,$1800 STEFANO RICCI Black Perforated Leather Loafer Shoes 11 US 44 Euro 10 UK,Dr. Martens Brown Strap On Sandals Mens Size 5 M,CHACOS - Mens Chacos Size 11. Used - But Still Life Left!! Blue Straps.,Invicta 17973 Mens Sea Base Quartz Stainless Steel Casual Watch, Color:Two Tone,Steve Madden Mens Mastic Blue Slide Sport Sandals Shoes 7 Medium (D) BHFO 9563,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Cole Haan Air Lorenzo Driver Men’s Size 11.5 Black Loafers Causal Shoes ZV-320,


Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902


Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit


Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:


You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.