Scarpe ADIDAS ADIDAS Scarpe Uomo VERDE Tessuto BZ0127 c2128c

Scarpe ADIDAS ADIDAS Scarpe Uomo VERDE Tessuto BZ0127 c2128c

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, un, and un item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Marca: ADIDAS
Colore principale: VERDE Numero: Vari
Suola: Gomma Allacciatura: Lacci
Suoletta interna: Removibile,Tessuto Materiale: Tessuto
Codice: BZ0127
January 10, 2018

Scarpe ADIDAS ADIDAS Scarpe Uomo VERDE Tessuto BZ0127 c2128c

Back to Blog

Highlights

Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Adidas Adizero Adios 3 White Running Shoes Womens Sneakers BB6409 NEW Size 8,Women Adidas BA7716 EQT Support RF Running shoes white pink Sneakers,Womens Adidas Stella McCartney Pure Boost X Running Sneaker Ultra Size 7,Nike Air Max Plus TN Smokes, 306696 002, 2005, Gray, Mens Running Shoes, Size 12,Adidas Hamburg BY9673 black halfshoesNew Adidas Women’s CrazyTrain LT (size 7.5),Women's Adidas Stellasport Aleki X US Athletic Shoes Size 9 NEW JH,08 Mens Nike Magista Opus LTHR FG Tech Craft Soccer Cleats Volt 6.5 7 768890-707,adidas NEO Women's 10K W Lifestyle Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color:Man's/Woman's:Diversified latest design,Adidas Ultra Boost W Peach Pink Multicolor Size 5.5. AQ5166 Yeezy NMD,[Adidas] S80497 Stan Smith Bold Women Men Sneakers Shoes Black Hit,adidas Women's Energy Cloud WTC W Running Shoe - Choose SZ/Color:Men's/Women's:Direct Management,NEW Adidas Tubular Invader 2.0 Black / Silver Womens Shoes (BB2068) SIZE 6 - NIB,Adidas Women's PureBOOST X TR 2 White/Linen-BB3286,SLIGHTLY USED [S80682] Womens Adidas Ultraboost 3.0 - Black White size 8,Adidas Superstar Metallic Silver Glitter Sparkle Womens Trainers S75125,Men's Nike Flyknit Mariah Running Sneakers New Black White 918264-001 sku$110 NEW Mens Nike JORDAN B. FLY sz 8 BLACK White Basketball Sneakers Shoes,Adidas NMD R1 W Legend Ink Pick Your Size 4 to 10 Nomad S75232 Pink Glow BlueAdidas Springblade Razor Running Shoes G97688 Women's US 9 Grey Lime NEW $180,Adidas Tubular Shadow Women's Originals Size 8.5 US,12 WOMENS Adidas ADILETTE Velour Sandals Slides Flop Flops Black White DB1807 x1NEW adidas Adizero 5- Star 5.0 - White/Red Cleats (Men's Multiple Sizes)Bling Adidas w/ AB Swarovski Crystals Women's Originals Superstar Shoes - White,Adidas unisex niedrige Turnschuhe C77154 personifizierte SUPERSTARS P18g:Man's/Woman's:Modern Fashion,adidas Women's Techfit Capris - Choose SZ/Color:Man/Woman:Structured Fashion,New Mens Nike Jordan Future Boot Boots 854554-300 sz 10 Grove Green Light Bone,WOMENS ADIDAS EQT SUPPORT ADV SZ 10 SOFT NEONS WHITE GREY FROZEN YELLOW CQ2255WOMENS ADIDAS ORIGINALS DEERUPT RUNNER SZ 6.5 CHALK PINK BOLD ORANGE CQ2910,SALE ADIDAS WOMENS ULTRA BOOST UB X CORE BLACK MYSTERY RUBY BY1674 NEW,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Adidas - Duramo Cross Trail Outdoor Womens Purple Sneakers- Choose SZ/Color.,

Contact

Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
 


610.733.4804

Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit

Support

Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:

Donate

You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.