Born W9822 Leather Clogs Mules Brown Slip On Comfort Slides W9822 Born Womens Shoe SIZE 10 7a3fe5

Born W9822 Leather Clogs Mules Brown Slip On Comfort Slides W9822 Born Womens Shoe SIZE 10 7a3fe5

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Previously owned in gently condition. Very light scuffing near toes. Some scratches to heels. See photos (use zoom) & item description for details.
Style: Comfort Width: Medium (B, W)
Fastening: Slip On Color: Brown
Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.) Occasion: Casual
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 10 Brand: Børn
Material: Leather
January 10, 2018

Born W9822 Leather Clogs Mules Brown Slip On Comfort Slides W9822 Born Womens Shoe SIZE 10 7a3fe5

Back to Blog


Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Kenneth Cole REACTION Women's Loop-y Flat Ankle Bootie Finger Gusset Leather,Alberto La TORRE 4469 Black Suede / Faux Fur Zip-Up Ankle Heel Boots 36 / US 6,Luxury Eskimo Women Winter Big Fluffy Boots Fox Fur warm Multi Color Furry Boots,Taos Lilli Black Leather Loafers Women's US 8M,Journee Collection Kim Women US 8.5 Black Flats Free US Shipping,Chinese Style Old Beijing Floral Women's Dance Wedge Comfort Shoes US4-9 HOT**,Cole Haan Misses' Sylvan Black Suede/Leather Riding Zippered Boots Size 9.5B,New Vince Haider Suede Flint Stock Heel Bootie Ankle Boots 9.,Sperry Top Sider Women's Bahama 2 Eye Brown/Purple Plaid Boat Shoe 6M,Jimmy Choo Marlin Buckled Patent Leather Ankle Boots. Size 34Man's/Woman's FRYE Women's Julie Combat Boot Aesthetic appearance Upper material Explosive good goodsJEFFREY CAMPBELL WOMEN'S BLACK BENATAR STUDDED ANKLE BOOTS LEATHER SHOES HEELS,Chic Womens Flat Heel Suede Casual Bandage Ballet Girls Ladies Shallow Mouth New,New Fashion Spring Summer Low White Canvas Shoes Leisure Women's Shoes,Man's/Woman's Naturalizer Women's Tamsie Ankle Bootie High quality and low overhead Beautiful fine,MANOLO BLAHNIK Chocolate/Black 100% Pony Knee High Boots - HANDSOME - 36.5/US6,Man's/Woman's Roper Women's Phoenix Western Boot Clearance price fashionable professional design,Baffin Women's Dana Snow Boot Charcoal 8 M USKork Ease ANABEL Brown Leather Studded Ballet Flat Comfort Shoe Womens SIZE 10,Saint Laurent Black Velvet Candy Platform Sandals Size 40.5 Relisted-non payment,Dingo Women's Heart Throb Western Boot Rust Triad 9 M US,Womens Flat Heel Slip On Casual Pumps Rivet Rhinestone Pointy Toe Fashion ShoesH by Hudson Women's Apisi Boot Navy 8 M US / 39 EU,Isaac Mizrahi New York Katharine3 Women's Dark Blue Flat Shoe 6.5M,JIMMY CHOO BOOTS SIZE 38.5 BLACK MADE IN ITALY IN GREAT CONDITION (US 8.5),Women mojari jutti traditional punjabi khussa shoes indian flip flop USsize 6-10,Aerosoles Womens “Fine N Andy" Mary Jane Brown Leather Loafers 6.5 M Drivers EUC,Men/Women Ariat Women's Desert Sky Western Boot Not so expensive High-quality materials Most practical,Gentle Souls GS01807SU Womens Binx Ankle Bootie- Choose SZ/Color.,Destroy couture Runway western cowboy boot 6.5 UK4 37,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Beautiful Big Bow Ballerina Flats Shoes Red White Black,


Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902


Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit


Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:


You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.