NEW the Stuart Weitzman Highland Over the NEW Knee boot Shoe, Black Leather, size 5M 4d3cc2

NEW the Stuart Weitzman Highland Over the NEW Knee boot Shoe, Black Leather, size 5M 4d3cc2

Item specifics

Condition: New with defects :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item. Possible cosmetic imperfections range from natural colour variations to scuffs, cuts or nicks, hanging threads or missing buttons that occasionally occur during the manufacturing or delivery process. The apparel may contain irregular or mismarked size tags. The item may be missing the original packaging materials (such as original box or tag).  New factory seconds and/or new irregular items may fall into this category.  The original tags may or may not be attached. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: I purchased these boots as new from department store. But there are some marks on the bottom, the heel and the side as shown in photos. Please take a careful look at the photos and bid only if you don't mind. This is why these boots are on big sale.
Model: Highland Material: Leather
Modified Item: No Width: Medium (B, M)
Style: Over Knee Boots Pattern: Solid
Boot Shaft Height: Over-the-Knee Color: Black
Product Line: Highland Occasion: Casual, Dress, Outdoor, Party, Work
Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up) Brand: Stuart Weitzman
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 5 Heel Type: Stacked
UPC: Does not apply
January 10, 2018

NEW the Stuart Weitzman Highland Over the NEW Knee boot Shoe, Black Leather, size 5M 4d3cc2

Back to Blog


Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Women's NATURALIZER N5 Comfort Black Quilted Slip On Shoes Ballet Flats Sz 6.5W,SKECHERS Slip On Suede Leather Cross Stripe Clogs Sz 7 Euro 37 Wooden Base Shoes,Dr. Scholl’s Womens Brown Loafers Size 7.5 (407298),Muck Boots Company Women's WOODY MAX, MOSSY OAK BREAK-UP CAMO, Neoprene Rubber,Brunello Cucinelli Brown Leather Peep Toe Monili Ankle Boot Sz IT40/US10~RTL$895,Rampage Womens White Ankle Strap Flats Size 9 (404674),Corral Saltillo Golden Harness Tool Soled Size 7.5 Worn Once,Womens Fashion Party Leather Rhinestone Crystal Knee High Slouch Boots Shoes T23,Clarks Collection Ashland Lane 63066 Wine Burgundy Slip On Loafers Shoes Sz 7.5M,Aquazzara Sz 38 Sasha Bootie Fringe Cognac,Teva Women's W Foxy Tall Waterproof Boot Black 6.5 M US,CLARKS Women's Shoes Slip On Clogs Mules Light Brown Leather Sz 9 M Brazil,Donald J Pliner New Aspyn Black Leather Over The Knee Engineer Boots Size 6 1/2M,FRYE 73590 Womens Brielle Zip Peep Bootie Boot- Choose SZ/Color.,Dr. Doc Martens Phina The Walking Dead Knee-High Boots Buckles Womens US Size 5,Womens Luxury Thong Sheepskin Australian Flip Flop Rubber Sole Slippers,Women's Pumps Boat Shoes Furry Bowknot Pull On Living Outdoor Casual Loafers Q38,Rag & Bone Ankle Boot Agnes Burgundy Suede Size 37.5 High Heel Bootie NEW,TOD'S Purple Leather Brogue Detail Ankle Bootie Boots 6/36 (3698) Hand Made,SOFT SPOTS ALL DAY COMFORT Maroon Wedge Shoes Leather Stephanie Slip On 7M 7New Women Pointed Toe Faux Fur Decor Ankle Strap Pearl Loafers Casual Shoes H100,SAS handsewn red maroon cordova Leather Flats loafers sz 9.5 S narrow,Man's/Woman's Minnetonka Moccasins 10 Gray Fringe High security modern Superb craftsmanship,Silver Round Toe Causal Sexy Padded Glitter Womens Silp On Flats Shoes Size 7.5,LaRosa Women's Sneaker Casual Fashion Loafer Slip-On Espadrille Flat Canvas S...,NEW 39 ANTHROPOLOGIE VIC MATIE STIVALE LOCHS TALL BOOT WOOL SHAFT LEATHER ITALY,sz 9 NEW RAG & BONE womens BOOTS Oliver Black Leather / shearling shaft moto,$1795 NIB VALENTINO REBELLE RUNWAY PATENT LEATHER FRONT ZIP BOOTS 38 39,Junk Gypsy Hwy 237 Ankle Buckle Boot in Wine JG0026A,CORRAL Women's White Cross and Wings Snip Toe Cowgirl Boots A3571,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Women Leather Slip On Flats Low Wedges Heel Pumps Loafers Work Nurse Comfy Shoes,


Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902


Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit


Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:


You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.