Eric Michael Women's, London Low Heel Ankle Boots / Black 37 M EU / Boots 6.5-7 B(M) US 697173

Eric Michael Women's, London Low Heel Ankle Boots / Black 37 M EU / Boots 6.5-7 B(M) US 697173

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
EAN: 0808934179058
Color: Black MPN: LONDON-005
Size: 37 M EU / 6.5-7 B(M) US Brand: Eric Michael
US Shoe Size (Women's): 37 M EU / 6.5-7 B(M) US UPC: 808934179058
Style: Black
January 10, 2018

Eric Michael Women's, London Low Heel Ankle Boots / Black 37 M EU / Boots 6.5-7 B(M) US 697173

Back to Blog


Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Women Canvas Flats Shoes Embroidered Flamingo Design Casual Students Cozy Shoes,Gentleman/Lady Aquatalia Womens Fedorah Louis, elaborate Highly praised and appreciated by the consumer audience Perfect processing,Womens Slipper Pointy Toe Floral Sandals Casual Leisure Satin Mules Sip ON ShoesStuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle Boot, Multi Botantic Embroidery, 7.5 Medium,Mr/Ms Ariat Ladies' Legend Cowgirl Boots New varieties are launched Attractive fashion Authentic guaranteeCordani Calzature Brown Suede Sheepskin Heel Clogs Mules Shoes 38 US,WHITE MOUNTAIN CLIFFS "Roar" Fabric Animal Print Ballet Flats Women's 11W (EUC)Gentlemen/Ladies Naot ANISE Black Leather Clogs Fine workmanship Elegant style Popular recommendationLa Canadienne Women's Jasmin Black Suede Boot 5 M BKENZIE Women's Shoes Size 10M - "Sybille" Lt Green Leather with Kitten Heals NEW,Abilene Ladies' Vintage Punchy Toe Cowgirl Boots,Dr. Martens Women's Aimilita Black Aunt Sally Leather Fashion Boot,Fashion Womens High Platform Slip On Shoes Shinning Sequins Casual Sneakers SizeMerrell Primo Breeze II Tan Womens 11 / 42.5 Mesh Slides Mules Slip On Shoes On6,Man's/Woman's KWP SHOES WOMENS SIZE 38 Year-end special promotions Optimal price Simple,Gentle Souls GS01868Y9 Womens Harper Fashion Sneaker- Choose SZ/Color.,Womens PAUL GREEN DEXTER taupe leather ankle boots sz. 8 (UK) (USA 10.5)SKECHERS Mesh Beige Leather Mary Janes Casual Shoes Womens Size 8,Gentleman/Lady Arhus Duckfeet Shearling Lined Boots Various styles High quality and economy Human border,L Artiste By Spring Step Natalia Blue Womens Tall Shaft Boot Size 38MWomens Slip On Rhinestone Dress Ballet Flats Comfort Shoes Champagne,ALBERTO FERMANI Womens Dark Brown Suede Leather Ankle Booties Sz 39.5 NEW!Musse & Cloud Womens Black Slides Size 8 (405274),Dingo Women's Rosita Brown Leather 9.5 B US,Ladies AEROSOLES Cream & Floral Flats AUS Size 9 Ballet Bows,Men's/Women's CLARKS Women's Hopedale Wish Boot wholesale Let our goods go to the world Modern and elegant,Women's DONALD J. PLINER Vale 228814 black suede pull on booties sz. 6 MAEROSOLES 7.5B Career Path Burgundy Suede-like Casual Loafers,NIB $358 Frye Cara Pickstitch Women's Mid Leather Boot Whiskey Brown Size 7.5 MMen's/Women's kenneth cole womens boots Reliable quality Moderate cost Different styles and styles,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Women's SONOMA FLORENCE Olive Canvas Slip On Platform Flats Casual Shoes NEW,


Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902


Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit


Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:


You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.