Stuart Weitzman Glitter Gray 6.5 Corkswoon Wedges Size US 6.5 Gray Regular (M, B) ddc5a1

Stuart Weitzman Glitter Gray 6.5 Corkswoon Wedges Size US 6.5 Gray Regular (M, B) ddc5a1
Gently used
  • Scuff on soles

This item has visible signs of wear

Display shoe size 6.5. Metallic grey glitter canvas Stuart Weitzman platform wedges with round-toes, tonal stitching throughout and cork heels.

L Listed by:  Lafron

Responds within: 24 hrs

Ask a Question


Stuart Weitzman


Glitter Grey Gray Glitter-gray

Heel Height:

Ultra High 4"+

Heel Style:



US 6.5


corkswoon wedge


Regular (M, B)



Style Tags:

Stuart Weitzman Wedges

January 10, 2018

Stuart Weitzman Glitter Gray 6.5 Corkswoon Wedges Size US 6.5 Gray Regular (M, B) ddc5a1

Back to Blog


Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Dsquared2 Brown Crocodile Embossed Leather Slingback Open Toe Platform Mid Heel Pumps Size US 8 Regular (M, B)Manolo Blahnik Black and White Mules/Slides Size US 9.5 Regular (M, B),Givenchy Black Ready To Ship Pool Sandals Size EU 39 (Approx. US 9) Regular (M, B),Jeffrey Campbell Red New Black Tulips Floral Leather Chunky Platforms Size US 7 Regular (M, B),RED Valentino Black With Buckle Patent Leather Boots/Booties Size US 7.5 Regular (M, B)Dolce&Gabbana Brown Flats Size US 7 Regular (M, B),Christian Louboutin Black Patent Leather Pumps Size EU 39 (Approx. US 9) Regular (M, B),Christian Louboutin Beige/ Silver Wedges Size EU 40 (Approx. US 10) Regular (M, B),Chloé Salmon Shimmer Signature Vivid Blue Scalloped Trim Soft Leather Ballerina Ballet 38 Euro Flats Size US 9 Regular (M, B),Saint Laurent Black Tribtoo 105 Cap Kid Scamosciato/Vernicw Nero Pumps Size EU 38 (Approx. US 8) Regular (M, B)Saint Laurent Neon Pink / Fluo Pink Jane Sandal Formal Shoes Size EU 38.5 (Approx. US 8.5) Regular (M, B)Salvatore Ferragamo Brown 2260-20 Pumps Size US 5.5 Regular (M, B),Tory Burch Red and Blue No Flats Size US 6 Regular (M, B),Burberry Black Espadrille Wedges Size US 9 Regular (M, B)Christian Louboutin Wedges Size US 10.5 Regular (M, B),Louise et Cie Bronze Gold Flats Size US 6.5 Regular (M, B),Burberry Black Kids House Check Panel Rain Boots/Booties Size US 8.5 Regular (M, B)Tory Burch Black Thong Leather Sandals Size US 7.5 Regular (M, B),Tory Burch Bougainville Pink Cameron - Sandals Size US 6 Regular (M, B)Topshop Brown Boots/Booties Size US 10,Tory Burch Orange Leather Divine Bow Driver Gold Reva Ballet Flats Size US 10 Regular (M, B),Cole Haan Maple Sugar Patent Emory Pumps Size US 5 Regular (M, B)Saint Laurent Blue Ysl Tribtoo 105 Royal Patent Leather Pumps Size EU 37 (Approx. US 7) Regular (M, B),Chloé Camel Leather Cutout Heels Pumps Size US 6.5 Regular (M, B)Vince Blue Platform Sandals Size US 7 Regular (M, B),Alexander McQueen Blue Strappy Satin Open Toe Criss Cross Curved Heel Sandals Size US 8.5 Regular (M, B),Saint Laurent Tobacco Suede Wyatt Boots/Booties Size EU 38 (Approx. US 8) Regular (M, B),Christian Louboutin Black Simple 100 Pumps Size EU 38 (Approx. US 8) Regular (M, B)Tory Burch Laura Flat Thong- Spark Gold Sandals Size US 9 Regular (M, B),Stuart Weitzman Black Hiline Boots/Booties Size US 8.5 Regular (M, B),

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Kendall + Kylie Nude Natural Enya Formal Shoes Size US 9.5 Regular (M, B),


Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902


Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit


Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:


You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.