Men's/Women's mens black Guarantee winter boots size 7 Guarantee black quality and quantity the most economical Official website 7ee462

Men's/Women's mens black Guarantee winter boots size 7 Guarantee black quality and quantity the most economical Official website 7ee462

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: boot
Brand: Kenetrek Boots Size Type: medium
US Shoe Size (Men's): 12 Size (Men's): 14
Width: Medium (D, M) UPC: Does not apply
January 10, 2018

Men's/Women's mens black Guarantee winter boots size 7 Guarantee black quality and quantity the most economical Official website 7ee462

Back to Blog


Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Cole Haan Quincy Suede Chukka Boot, 7, Grey,Nocona Black Lizard Leather Cowboy Boots Mens Size 10 D Style 7150192205 USA,Thorocraft Men’s Black/Gray Leather/Fabric Ankle Chukka Boots Size 42 (US 9)New! Mens Belleville 695V WP 200g Insulated USAF Flight Boot SZ 8 WIDE Sage N47DAN POST Med Brown Leather Cowboy Western Boots - Men's 11.5 D,Tony Lama Peanut Brittle Leather Cowboy Boots Mens Size 12 B Style 2806 USAMen's Honey Black Two Tone Overlay Saddle Cowboy Boots Rodeo Toe,Mens Pole Dancing Over Knee Boots Side Zip Ridding Show Shoes Patent Leather T64Mens Casual Retro work Desert pull on Shoes Suede Leather Ankle Chelsea Boots,Whites Boots Spokane Brown Leather Rubber Hunting Logger Winter Work Boots 11,Men's/Women's Mens Hi-Tec Walking Boots - Logan Comfortable feeling Fast delivery Acknowledgement feedback,Laredo Men's Western Boot Brown Size 8D,Cody James Black All Leather Cowboy Western Boots Mens Size 10.5 D Style BBS5,Merrell J41917 Moab Polar Waterproof ‑ Black 11,L.L. Bean Maine Small Batch Navy Blue Leather Duck Boots Men’s 6 Ladies 7,New Kenneth Cole Mens Desert Sun Black Suede Ankle Boots Size 8,MENS VINTAGE HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTORCYCLE BOOTS IN SIZE 9.5 NICE USED SHAPE,Dunham Cloud Waterproof Hiking Boots MCR66308 Men Size 10.5,MENS SAFETY STRUCTURAL FIREFIGHTER BLACK SIZE 13 1/2 WORK BOOTS NEWKeen Louisville 6" Sz 10.5 M (D) Mens Steel Toe Utility Work Boots 1007965Men's Rudel Cowboy Boots Black Leather 8E Wide Western Design Vibram Heels,Mens Faux Leather Motor Pleated Pointed Toe British Mid Calf Boots Zip 2018 hot,Aldo Western Dark Brown Zip Side Boot Size 41/US 8-8.5Lamo Men's Logan Suede Ankle Boot,Bates ICWB Intermediate Cold/Wet Combat Boot Military Gortex Black 14.5 W NIB,Mens Fleece Lining Mid Calf Snow Boots Slip On Warm Winter Waterproof Shoes F122,Mens Long High Boots Leather Zipper Military Boots Riding jockey boots ShoesFrogg Toggs F25111 Mens Non-Slip Wading Boots with Studs FAST FREE USA SHIPPING,Men Fur Lined Thick Warm Pull On Mid Calf Boots Leather Winter Snow Shoes Winter,MEN'S ARIAT 'OILED BROWN' WESTERN BOOTS SIZE 10.5 D,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Dr Martens Harrisland Leather boots Men's US 9 Black NEW,


Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902


Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit


Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:


You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.