Pajar Women's Alice-W, US Black, 37 EU/6-6.5 M US Alice-W, 7dbb0a

Pajar Women's Alice-W, US Black, 37 EU/6-6.5 M US Alice-W, 7dbb0a

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 771868466733
Weight: 3.44 lbs EAN: 0771868466733
Dimensions: L 14 x W 13.7 x H 4.7 inches Brand: Pajar
NumberOfItems: 1 MPN: Alice-W
PartNumber: PS-ALICE-001 Binding: Shoes
ProductTypeSubcategory: 30907733 ClothingSize: 37 EU/6-6.5 M US
ISBN: Not Applicable Color: Black
Style: Not Applicable Department: womens
US Shoe Size (Women's): 37 EU/6-6.5 M US
January 10, 2018

Pajar Women's Alice-W, US Black, 37 EU/6-6.5 M US Alice-W, 7dbb0a

Back to Blog

Highlights

Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Nine West Size 6 M PATTYCAKE Brown Leather Knee High Boots New Womens Shoes,Vintage Womens Punk Real Leather Mid-calf Boots Goth Roma Knight Boots Plus Size,Clarks Womens Maypearl Juno Ankle Bootie- Pick SZ/Color.,Jack Rogers Sadie Suede Womens Ankle Bootie- Choose SZ/Color.BareTraps Women's Bt Respect2 Riding Boot, Black, 8.5 US/8.5 M USVintage 1960s Bort Carlton Womens BootsBohoBrown 8 GREAT FALL BOOT! Riding boot,DRD0166 Crush by Durango Women's Embossed Western Bootie - Vintage Brown NEW,Propet Women's Tory Ankle Bootie Brown 8 M USLifeStride Women's Xripley Riding Boot, Dark Grey, 8 M US,Punk Women's Real Leather Cowboy Western Riding Boots Buckle Strappy Block Heels,Carlos by Carlos Santana Women's Shadow Motorcycle Boot, Black, 11 Medium US,Womens Roman Leather Chain Decor Low Chunky Heels Knee High Boots Riding ShoesTeva Women's W DE LA Vina Dos Boot, Black, 6 M USMen's/Women's FitFlop Women's Supermod Boot Ankle Bootie Guarantee quality and quantity Let our goods go to the world Shopping promotionAriat Remington Ink Leather with Tassels Western Knee High Women Boots Size 7B,Womens FRYE BILLY 225787 brown leather pull on cowboy boots sz. 6.5 B,LEWIT Renata Black Leather Cuff Over the Knee Boots Block Heel 38.5 EU $395Hunter Classic Brown Original Gloss Tall Equestrian Boots 10 EXC,Durango Let Love Fly Rebel Cowgirl Boot - Square Toe - RD4424WOMEN'S BORN OLANA CROWN COLLECTION SASSO SUEDE BOOTS 10M,Cole Haan Women's Dutchess Stretch Neoprene Back Boots TW4 Black Size 10.5B $350,Anne Klein Women's Junip Leather Riding Boot, Black, 5.5 M US$230 NWT STEVE MADDEN Nanett Belted Knee High Black Grained leather Boot sz 6.5,Free People Rust Suede Zebra Calf Hair Heel Last Outlaw Ankle Boots Size 38 8,Ariat Women's Legend Boot - Chocolate Chip - 9B NEW IN BOXFitFlop Women's Gogh Pro Superlight Medical Profes - Choose SZ/color,Sam Edelman Women's Laney Pump, - Choose SZ/color,Pleaser Electra-3028 black patent buckled platform thigh high boots sizes 6-14,Propet Women's Madison Ankle Strap-W Black 6.5 M USNew! Sam Edelman 'Paloma' Over the Knee Black Suede Boots Size 6.5 OTK

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Ivanka Trump OFFIN-BLKMUL Offin Women US lack Knee High Boot- Choose SZ/Color.,

Contact

Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
 


610.733.4804

Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit

Support

Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:

Donate

You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.