2019 Vogue Womens Occident Round Toe Knee Punk Boots Biker Shoes Rivet Punk Knee Chunky SZ 8b6639

2019 Vogue Womens Occident Round Toe Knee Punk Boots Biker Shoes Rivet Punk Knee Chunky SZ 8b6639

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Unbranded
Heel Type: Cuban Style: Knee High Boots
Material: Leather Country/Region of Manufacture: China
Occasion: Party Fastening: Zip
Pattern: Solid Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.)
Width: Medium (B, M)
January 10, 2018

2019 Vogue Womens Occident Round Toe Knee Punk Boots Biker Shoes Rivet Punk Knee Chunky SZ 8b6639

Back to Blog

Highlights

Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Frye•Harness•TALL Brown Leather •Knee High Boots•Size 9.5 B,ECCO Women's Intrinsic 3 Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/colorPUMA Women's Phenom Wn Sneaker - Choose SZ/color,Columbia Meadows Shorty Omni-Heat 3D Women's Boots Winter Waterproof Insulated,Ariat Womens Shoes 10000822 Fatbaby Original Work Boot- Choose SZ/Color.,Women’s Fly London Boots Black Oil Suede / Rug Size Euro 40 US 9,Merrell Women's Tremblant Mid Polar Waterproof Snow Boot Faux Fur Rain Leather,Fly london Mong944fly Black Leather Womens Ankle BootsWomen's Shoes Zigi Soho DASHER Tall Riding Boots Fashion Brown Size 7.5,Tory Burch Eloise Leather Riding Boots Dark Brown Women Sz 5M 1053,CLARKS Womens Araya Turner Closed Toe Ankle Fashion Boots Black Size 8.0 l51G,Koolaburra Womens Duarte Black Leather/Suede Motorcycle Boots Shoes 5 BHFO 7800,Silver Grey DKODE Knee-High Zip-Up Boots 5 35,Lot Thigh High Heel Boots Scrunch Fringe Faux Leather Suede Quilted StilettoMadden Girl Women's Kloo Engineer Boot - Choose SZ/ColorDOLCE VITA HOLLAND Multi-Colored Suede Designer Boots Ankle Boots 8.5 M,Ariat 10023161 Round Up Outfitter 11" Embroidered Wide Square Toe Cowgirl Boots,CLARKS Women's Aria Mary Jane Flat - Choose SZ/colorCorso Como NEW STIRRUP Brown Leather Knee High Equestrian Riding Boots 6.5 $199,Ariat 10011953 Round Up D-Toe 12" Brown Leather Cowgirl Fashion Riding Boots 7.5,Man's/Woman's NEW CUPLÉ WOMENS ANKLE BOOTS Excellent craft low cost Reliable reputation,Charles by Charles David Womens Reform Leather Open Toe Ankle, Beige, Size 8.0PALLADIUM Pallabosse Hi Cuff L Women Black / Black 95522-060-M,NEW VIONIC UPRIGHT RORY WOMENS BLACK LEATHER ANKLE BOOT SHOES HEEL 7-10Diesel Drinky Party Bathidas Leather Heels Ankle Pointy Boots Black 5 NIB $240,Corral Girls' Aztec Embroidery Cowgirl Boot - Square Toe Gold 5.5,Aerosoles Women's Sensitivity Knee High Boot - Choose SZ/Color,HENRY BEGUELIN Distressed Brown Leather Pointy Toe Ankle Bootie Sz 37.5 B4632,Teva Women's W Willow Chelsea Boot - Choose SZ/color,Sam Edelman Women's Pedra Ankle Bootie - Choose SZ/Color,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Bocage Paris Size US 9 Black Womens Textured Ankle Boots Block Heel Shoes,

Contact

Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
 


610.733.4804

Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit

Support

Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:

Donate

You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.