Authentic Christian Leather/ LouboutinAres Espadrilles - Calf Leather/ Christian Toile Ravee size 97defb

Authentic Christian Leather/ LouboutinAres Espadrilles - Calf Leather/ Christian Toile Ravee size 97defb

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Black calf leather studded Christian Louboutin espadrilles - only 3x, newly resoled - practically new!
Style: Espadrille Flats Features: Studs
Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.) EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 35
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 5 Color: Black
Pattern: Solid Brand: Christian Louboutin
January 10, 2018

Authentic Christian Leather/ LouboutinAres Espadrilles - Calf Leather/ Christian Toile Ravee size 97defb

Back to Blog

Highlights

Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Men's/Women's CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN MESH PEEP-TOE FLATS Adequate supply and timely delivery Attractive fashion high quality product,LIMI feu Flat Shoes Black L Size Ballet Style Enamel Elegance Genuine Japan,Valentino Garavani Flower Embroidered Ankle-Wrap Espadrille Shoes Ivory,NEW Tory Burch Rosalind Bow Pointy Toe Flats Silver Rhinestone Size 9.5 $278,Authentic Salvatore Ferragamo Beige Leather VARA ribbon pumps 5 1/2C,HOGAN WOMEN'S CLASSIC LEATHER FORMAL SHOES NEW H259 ROUTE RESTYLING ELASTICO D30,Laura Bellariva 9251 Black Stamped Leather Mary Jane Heels Shoes 39 / US 9,New $248.00 FRYE Slip On Slides Gray Suede 7.5 MNEW REPETTO WOMENS BLACK LILI BALLERINA FLAT,Klogs Fairfax Women's Casual Shoe Black August - 7.5 Medium,Alexander Wang Dylan Low-Knit Espadrille Sneaker sz 37.5,AUTHENTIC CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN KING BOAT SPIKE LEATHER SLIP-ONS GRADE B USED-ATFrye NIB $158 melanie slip-on royal blue flats 7M,ECCO Soft 7 perforated Metallic Sneakers Sz US 6, 6.5 new $150NEW Alegria Leather Side Zip Ankle Boots - Hayden US 7 - 7.5 BEAUTY BLUR,Oasis Suzie Women's Leather Oxford Sneakers - Extra-Depth - New in Box,SESTO MEUCCI Dark Brown Genuine Crocidile Loafers Size 8CHIC! BALLY (Paris) Black Calf Loafers w/Brown Woven Leather Tops & Bands 9.5B,AUTH YSL Saint Laurent Women Small Heart Flat Shoes 40.5DOLCE & GABBANA Brocade Ballet Flats Ballerinas AUDREY Crystal Brooch Blue 06757,Vince Women's Gray Warner Limestone Leather Sneaker Sz 9M 3229NWOB$2395 Brunello Cucinelli 100%Leather Monili Bead Platform Loafer 37/7US A181,Gentleman/Lady NEW CESARE CASADEI WOMENS BALLET FLATS Elegant and sturdy set meal Lush design fine,MARNI Black Mocs Loafers Flats Oxford Dress Shoes Size 39/9 (3804) $600+NWOB Band of Outsiders Women's Black Leather Saddle Shoes Euro 37/US 6-6.5 Italy,$675 MIU MIU BY PRADA SHOES STUDDED LEATHER SMOKING SLIPPERS LOAFERS 39.5 / 9.5,Aquazzura Wild Thing Suede 85mm Sandal, Rose Gold 36,Anne Klein AK Sport Women's Umeko Ballet Flat, Metallic Taupe, 8.5 M US,Men's/Women's NEW SPAZIOMODA WOMENS LOAFERS Easy to clean surface buy Various latest designs,MBT shoes pink nabuk women moccasins AB445

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

BN 4.2K$ TOD'S EXOTIC ALLIGATOR CROC CROCODILE SKIN MOCCASSIN LOAFERS,

Contact

Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
 


610.733.4804

Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit

Support

Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:

Donate

You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.