Men's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53d

Men's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53dMen's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53d

Item specifics

Condition:
: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Product Line: John Varvatos
Euro Size: EUR 44 Brand: Converse
Pattern: Solid Country/Region of Manufacture: China
Width: Medium (D, M) US Shoe Size (Men's): 10
Color: Red Material: Nylon
Features: Slip Resistant Style: Fashion Sneakers
January 10, 2018

Men's/Women's Mens John Varvatos Excellent Converse 10 superior Year-end sale Excellent Varvatos stretching ddc53d

Back to Blog

Highlights

Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Men Tassel Casual Shoes Slip On Loafers British Round Toe British Shoes FlatsMens Real Leather Embroidered Oxford Casual Horsebit Slipper Loafer Shoes Black,Sperry Top-Sider By New Balance Mens 8Nos New Underground Shoes Red Plaid Tartan British England Punk Psychobilly UK4,Sperry Top-Sider 0191312 Men's A/O 2-Eye Boat Shoes, Navy, 9.5 US,Puma Ps R698 Roxx 36085701 Casual Shoes Black Medium (D,M) Men,Sperry Top-Sider A/O 2 Eye Deck Shoe - Washed Navy Canvas,NAUTILUS Mens Size 7 W Water Proof COMPOSITE Toe Safety Shoes Grey Yellow 1800,RALPH LAUREN Shoes Man 45 European 10 US RL10 D-310.5 M mens COLE HAAN brwon leather kilted loafers shoes,ONITSUKA TIGER MEN'S SNEAKERS US 8.5 NEW SALE,Skechers for Work 77125W Mens Flex Advantage Bendon Wide ShoeW,Island Surf Co. Men's Atlantic Parchment Moc Toe Shoes,FRYE Men's Harvey Cap Toe Oxford, Black, Size 7M, New,Dockers Mens Trustee 2.0 Leather Dress Casual Oxford Shoe - Choose SZ/Color,STICO WSS-100 Green Mens Non-Slip Safety Shoes Comfortable Breathable KOREA_Ec,ECCO Mens Brown Leather Loafers Size 13 M Slip On Shoes,Clarks 26115424 Mens Hawkley Free- SIZE 11.5 Color BROWN BRAND NEW~,men's shoes FDF SHOES 10 () elegant black leather BZ375-C,NEW Puma Fenty by Rihanna Cleated Creeper Suede Black Shoes Sneakers WomensMens Fashion slip on Floral embroider wedding dress formal loafers shoes new szMens Moccasins Embroidery Floral Nightclub Fashion Dress Shoes Driving Loafer 43Clarks Men's UnRhombus Go US 11 M Navy Blue Nubuck Leather Oxfords Shoes $150.00NIKE AIR TRAINER III PREMIUM QS BO KNOWS HORSE RACING Sz 8.5-10.5 682933-001,DISTRESSED VINTAGE USA ALL SEASON CASUALS BLACK LEATHER ENGINEER VIBRAM SHOES 9D,Stacy Adams Men's Florian Penny Loafer 25038Men Rivet Shoes Slip On Suede Moccasin-Gommino Low Top Flats Leisure Loafers new,NIKE Men's Shoes 005943 Grey 26cm,Weinbrenner Thorogood 804-6373 Men's 14 inch Firefighter Structural Bunker BootsROCKPORT M77014 WALK WEAR 2.0 HOOK & LOOP MEN'S WHITE WALKING SHOES sz 12W(WIDE)

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Vans Darth Vader Star Wars Black Canvas Slip On Men’s Size 12 EUC,

Contact

Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
 


610.733.4804

Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit

Support

Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:

Donate

You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.