New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
|Pattern:||Solid||Country/Region of Manufacture:||China|
|Width:||Medium (D, M)||Euro Size:||39-44|
|US Shoe Size (Men's):||7|
Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.
After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.
Crafting a Policy
Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.
As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.
Framing the Legislation
In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.
To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.
Making the Pitch
In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.
We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”
We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4
In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.
Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.
In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.KEEN Durham ESD Soft Toe 1014602 ASTM F2892-11 SD Black Work Shoes Men's 10 D,Skechers Men's Glides Calculous Slip-On Loafer,Dark Brown,11.5 M USPolo Ralph Lauren Size 8.5 M IAN Navy Leather Fashion Sneakers New Mens Shoes,Invicta Mens II Chronograph 18k Gold-Plated and Silver-Tone Stainless Steel,adidas Originals x Pharrell x BBC Men's Sneaker Stan Smith(8)Green Palm Trees,Men Fashion British Pointy Toe Business Leather Crocodile Print Dress Shoes Y353,Skechers Mens Resterly Work Shoes 12 Black,Men's/Women's adidas Rose Englewood Boost Elegant appearance New in stock King of the crowd,Clarks Mens Frelan Hike M- Pick SZ/Color.Vans Old Skool Pro Black White Mens Skateboard Shoes,Anatomic & Co LINS 838305 Pinhao/Cafe Mens Slip On Mocassin Shoe (LR) (Kett),Stacy Adams Men's Dynamo Olive Suede Fashion Sneakers 303,Men’s Donald Pliner Alondro Leather Penny Loafer Brown Moccasins Size 11.5 NEW,Gentleman/Lady Adidas BUSENITZ RX Mens Sneaker BY4099 Crazy price modern Direct business,Converse Jack Purcell JP Signature Series Ox Suede Leather RED BLOCK 153589C,Diesel Men's Sneakers Spin y00668 ps967 h4609 8.5US,CHAPS Men's 'SEAWALL' Dark Brown Slip-On Sandals Sz. 13M NIB,Calvin Klein Mens Noble Dress Calf Fashion Sneaker- Pick SZ/Color.Cole Haan Men's Tucker Venetian Loafer French Roast 10.5 WMen/Women adidas ZX Flux Techfit Men's Sneakers… Ideal gift for all occasions product quality Sales online store,$425 MASSIMO REBECCHI Brown Leather Oxford Dress Casual Shoes 12 Mens Italy,Man's/Woman's Mens Anatomic Shoes Label Morumbi -w Complete specification range buy Global sales,Mens Clubwear Rhinestone Loafer Bowtie Slip On Metal Round Toe Shoes Korean Hot,SKECHERS USA Inc Skechers Mens Relaxed Fit Urban Voltaic- Choose SZ/Color.Rise Puma Blaze of Glory Ny is for Lovers,NEW John Varvatos Star USA - Star Clipper Boat Shoes / MSRP $198 / 10.5 / Brown,Nike Viale NSW Gym Blue White Men Casual Walking Shoes Sneakers AA2181-400Puma Ps R698 Roxx 36085701 Casual Shoes Black Medium (D,M) Men,H.S. Trask & Co. Men's Shoes US Sz11 M Casual Buffalo,2018 autumn and winter new men's boots first layer leather Martin boots,
Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.
Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.
Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:
The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:
You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:
The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.