Tony Size Lama Stallion Americana Western Boots 7906L, Kango, Size Tony 7B, Made in USA e2f648

Tony Size Lama Stallion Americana Western Boots 7906L, Kango, Size Tony 7B, Made in USA e2f648

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Modified Item: No
Width: Medium (B, M) Country/Region of Manufacture: United States
Fastening: Pull On Style: Western
Color: Brown US Shoe Size (Women's): US 7
Brand: Tony Lama Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.)
Heel Type: Block Material: Leather
UPC: 745515492055
January 10, 2018

Tony Size Lama Stallion Americana Western Boots 7906L, Kango, Size Tony 7B, Made in USA e2f648

Back to Blog


Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Womens Motorcycle Leather Over the Knee High Boots Wedge Heel Buckle Shoes NewBNIB INC International Concepts Ameliee Women Black Knee High Boot 7 M,Womens Winter Fur Lining High Top Boots Students Girls Leather Fashion Sneakers,sexy women pointy toe stilettos high heel over the knee strench thigh high boots,Man/Woman Jessica Simpson Women's Cachelle Ankle Bootie Not so expensive Trendy a lot of varieties,Carlos by Carlos Santana Women's Rachelle Ankle Boot 9 M Black Embroidered,XOXO Women's Martin Wc Riding Boot, Tan, 6 M US,Lori Goldstein Collection Boots with Scalloped Gore Detail Black/Gray Women's 5,Women's Black Canvas Knee High Boots - IF,Gothic,Goth,Punk,BikerFashion Womens Winter Fur Trim Zipper Wedge Hidden Heels Warm Shoes Ankle Boots,BANDOLINO Carlotta Two-Tone Brown Riding Boot, 5.5M, Faux Leather, MSRP $149,MADELINE girl Womens BRAMBLE Bootie, Hickory, 8.5 BM USLa Redoute Collections Womens Leather Ankle Boots With Wavy Elastic,Womens Chic Rhinestones Blcok Heels Ankle Boots High heels Zip Square Toe ShoesBCBGeneration Women's Bg-Allegro Ankle Bootie Smoke Taupe 8 B(M) US,chic women pointy toe strange heel suede ankle boots ladies party shoes high top,NIB Romika Anna 07 Ankle Boot Black Leather - Size 10FRYE 77300 GLD Gold Brown Leather Harness Riding Motorcycle Boot 12R Women's 5.5,Chic Women Round Toe Stretchy Pull On Booties Rhinestones Block Heels Ankle Boot,Chunky Heel Leather Pointy Toe Knee High Boots Fashion Womens Warm Winter Shoes,Irregular Choice Abigail's Third Party Gold Floral Womens Boots,Free People Knee High Boots 41 Brownish Tan Zipper Back Sexy Boots,Arturo Chiang Women's Bryson Dark Chocolate Leather Ankle Boot,Fashion Womens Suede Over Knee Thigh Boots Block High Heels New Nightclub Shoes,Sam Edelman Sylas British Burgundy Leather Ankle Boot Size 6,Bed Stu Eiffel Leather Ankle Boots Teak Driftwood Size 6.5 Bootie Zipper,TORY BURCH Black Fable Leather Pointed Toe Side Zip Ankle Bootie 7.5 B3608,Totes Women's Rosie2 Ankle-High Boot Black 10 C/D Us,Skechers Performance Women's Go Run Forza Boston 2 - Choose SZ/color,Women Real Suede Pointed Toe Block Heels Zippers Over Knee High Stretch Boots sz,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Men/Women NEW MALÌPARMI WOMENS BOOTS wholesale First grade in its class Highly appreciated and widely trusted in and out,


Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902


Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit


Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:


You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.