Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595

Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
US Shoe Size (Women's): 10.5
Product Line: Thea Brand: Nike
Color: Black Style: Running, Cross Training
Fastening: Lace Up UPC: 886916392305
January 10, 2018

Women's Metallic NIKE Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Metallic Women's - Size 10.5 (881564-001) 997595

Back to Blog

Highlights

Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Nike Air Huarache Run Ultra Womens 819151-007 Grey Black Running Shoes Size 7Drew Women's Gemini Athletic Shoes White Leather MeshNike Air Jordan 6 Low Infrared og 768881 123 ( 39 / 6.5 us / 6 uk),Nike Air Force 1 Upstep Metallic Anaconda Womens 917590-900 Blur Shoes Size 9.5,NIKE AIR MAX 270 RACER BLUE AH8050-401 BRAND NEW IN BOX SIZES 5 6 7 8 9 10 11Paul Green Orleans Platform Leather Sneakers, Women's Size 9, White,Adidas Superstar Slipon W Womens BZ0647 OLICAR,OLICAR,White Womens Size 7.5,Nike Air Jordan 14 Retro BG XIV AJ14 Last Shot Black Red Kid Youth 487524-003New Balance Women's 1080v8 Fresh Foam Running Shoe, Light Blue, 11 B US,NEWTON RUNNING GRAVITY 6 38.5-43.5 NEW fate kismet motion distance elite nb,NEW Women's New Balance WW847GR2 Gray and Pink Supportive Walking Shoe,NIKE AIR ZOOM FEARLESS FLYKNIT METALLIC WOMEN Black Training Shoe 922883-001 11',Wmns Nike Air Max 1 QS 633737 002 Rare Black Size 8.5,NIKE Womens Nike Free Rn Running 2017 880840-003 BLACK Size 5.5WOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS PUMA PLATFORM SLIP-ON SM [365900 01]1710 Nike Lunarglide 9 Women's Training Running Shoes 904716-014,Skechers Women's GOrun 400 Running ShoeGray/WhiteUS 8.5 M,NIKE AIR VAPORMAX FLYKNIT 2 942843-105 White White Grey Womens sz 6-11Nike Air Vapormax 2 Thunder Grey Teal Hot Punch 942843 White Geode Teal BlackNike Air Max 2015 Bling Shoes Light Aqua, Green Glow W Swarovski Crystals Size 8,Nike Air Max Plus LX Tuned 1 Suede Velvet Particle Rose Pink AH6788-600 Size 7,Nike Wmns Air Max 270 Triple White Women Running Shoes Sneakers AH6789-102,Sano by Mephisto Women's Excess,Marni Women's Scarpa Selva on Drill Slip On Sneaker Shoes Black Charity,NIKE AIR MAX 97 BORDEAUX WOMEN'S RUNNING SHOES - WOMEN'S SZ 7,Nike Air Max '97 Ultra '17 - Grey - Womens,Asics Noosa FF [T772N-3906] Women Running Shoes Aquarium/Flash Coral,Nike Studio Wrap Pack 3 Yoga Dance Pilates 684870 002 US7 UK4.5 EU38,Gentlemen/Ladies isabel marant sneakers 37 Cheap Modern and stylish fashion wonderfulHOGAN WOMEN'S SHOES SUEDE TRAINERS SNEAKERS NEW H258 TRADITIONAL BEIGE D64,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Original New Nike Air Max 97 Ultra 17 Trainers In Grey Gray Womens Shoes US 7.5,

Contact

Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
 


610.733.4804

Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit

Support

Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:

Donate

You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.