Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412

Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been used or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Very Good Condition. Some dings and divets on the back heels. Some leather creasing that comes with normal use. Smoke Free, Pet Free Home. Picture #8 is a stock photo
Model: Bethan Pattern: Solid
Modified Item: No Features: Buckle
Country/Region of Manufacture: China EUR Shoe Size (Women's): 40
Style: Riding Boots Color: Black
Boot Shaft Height: 16" MPN: Does Not Apply
Calf Width: 5" Calf Circumference: 15"
Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up) Occasion: Dress, Party, Work
US Shoe Size (Women's): 10 Brand: Lauren Ralph Lauren
Material: Leather Toe Type: Pointed Toe
Width: Medium (B, M) Heel Type: Stiletto
UPC: does not apply
January 10, 2018

Lauren Ralph Lauren Black Tall Heeled Boots Womens Black Lauren Leather Size 10M 9b3412

Back to Blog

Highlights

Print Post
  • A new Minnesota law represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty. Tweet This
  • Minnesota recently enacted a 12-month “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through the state's TANF. Tweet This

Many discussions about safety-net programs tend to focus on financial cliffs—how the impact of getting a raise or working additional hours may make participants ineligible for the very benefits they need to move into economic stability. Marriage is rarely part of this discussion, even though numerous studies show marriage is an important tool for moving families out of poverty.1 That marriage is often absent from these discussions is especially ironic, since the promotion of family stability—by encouraging marriage and discouraging nonmarital births—was among the chief policy rationales for welfare reform in 1996.

After reviewing research stressing the importance of eliminating marriage penalties, we developed and successfully advocated for legislation that would create a “honeymoon” period for newly-married couples receiving assistance through Minnesota’s version of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The legislation (HF 1453/SF 1165) received strong bipartisan support and was enacted by a Republican Legislature and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton in 2017. In our view, it represents the bi-partisan possibilities of enacting legislation based on the consensus that marriage is a vital tool for reducing poverty and fostering child well-being.

Crafting a Policy

Minnesota’s version of TANF is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), which provides work support and cash assistance for children and their parents, who are often low wage workers between jobs. There has been no increase in the amount of the cash benefit to participants in over 30 years. Both of our organizations were involved in advocating for an increase.

As we talked with people of faith across our state, especially religious leaders, we kept hearing about couples who wanted to be married but couldn’t afford to make this decision because adding another adult to the family’s income would put them over the poverty threshold used to determine eligibility.2 The concerns were often strongest for couples expecting a baby who wished to be married before birth of their child. Unfortunately, marriage would result in a loss of benefits at the exact time the new mother would be unable to work. We sought to address this marriage disincentive.

Framing the Legislation

In our experience, all elected officials want to help families and individuals in poverty. They desire all our citizens to be economically stable and prosperous, but they often have different ideas about how to make that happen. Our goal was to frame our bill in a way that showed a commitment to helping children live in stable, secure homes that lawmakers from both parties could champion.

To that end, we drafted a bill to create an 18-month window after marriage in which a new spouse’s income would not count when determining eligibility—a “honeymoon” period. This income disregard was modeled on an existing statute that addressed child support for children on MFIP. Due to constitutional concerns related to marriage incentive programs, we consciously chose to structure the bill in a way that would allow couples to choose to marry rather than reward those who married.

Making the Pitch

In seeking bill sponsors (and later other supporters), we spoke about the benefits of marriage to children and the challenges to couples that wanted to marry but knew the very real financial impact this would have on their families. We shared that the federal TANF Program, which is used to fund MFIP, specifically lists two marriage-related goals: to promote marriage and to reduce the number of children born out of wedlock.

We provided data from a joint American Enterprise Institute/Los Angeles Times study3 in which people in poverty were asked: “How often do you think unmarried adults chose not to get married to avoid losing welfare benefits?” Twenty-four percent of participants answered, “almost always,” and an additional 23% answered, “often.”

We also gave legislators highlighted copies of a 2009 study of the federal TANF program that showed participation in the TANF program had a negative effect on the probability of marriage, an effect that disappeared once participants moved off the program.4

In building strong bipartisan support for the legislation, we addressed some concerns along the way. For example, we made it clear that we were not judging single parents but instead creating a viable option for couples who wanted to be married. We also clarified that nothing in the bill would trap a parent in a relationship that was dangerous for the parent or children.

Our House author identified a concern we hadn’t anticipated—should the state allow continued participation in the MFIP program if a participant marries a middle or upper-class individual? We addressed this by amending the bill to include a cap on the income disregard, set at 275% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, the standard used to determine whether pregnant women and children are eligible for Medicaid.

In both chambers, the bill passed unanimously and was included in an omnibus bill signed by our Governor. Ultimately, the bill had to be amended to provide an income disregard for 12 months instead of the original 18. This change was unfortunate given that, ideally, this honeymoon period would last two or three years. Despite this amendment, the new law will likely make a significant impact by removing an obstacle to marriage for low-income households in our state.

Gentleman/Lady SoftWalk Women's Charming Ankle Bootie Not so expensive Beautiful General product,PEERAGE Kacey Women Wide Width Mid Heel Closed Toe Black Leather Dress Booties,Men/Women COLE HAAN..WATERPROOF..BROWN SUEDE..Ankle Boots..Size 10 B Economical and practical At a lower price Various latest designs,Franco Sarto Women's Banner Ankle Bootie Cognac 6.5 M US,Ivy Kirzhner Alpaca Truffle Taupe Emebellished Genuine Shearling Lined Boot,Sperry Womens Stella Leather Round Toe Ankle Fashion Boots, Black, Size 11.0 rGQRoper Western Cowgirl Boots Floral Scroll Embroidered Faux Leather Gray - Size 7,Women's DV Dolce Vita Black Suede 'Zela' Knee High Zip Boots Black Size 7.5 M,new ladies Dark Brown Round Toe Winter Mid-Calf sexy Boots Size 8.5ZARA BLOCK HEEL LEATHER COWBOY ANKLE BOOTS Ref. 3104/101,Ladies Pointed Shoes Genuine Leather High Heels Zip Up Ankle Boots US Size b052Musse & Cloud Anaeh Womens Suede Pull-On Belted Ankle Bootie Shoes Grey Size 9Evercreatures Women's Rain Boot Ankle Wellies Blue White Stripe,Brand New Naturalizer N5 Comfort Ankle Boots Booties Leather Black Size 7,B.O.C Womens Bolsena Leather Closed Toe Mid-Calf Fashion Boots, Black, Size 8.0,Tommy Hilfiger Women's Ankle Booties Sz 6.5M Taupe Perforated Stacked Block HeelLucky Brand Womens Kambry Suede Pointed Toe Ankle Fashion Driftwood Size 9.0 zMan's/Woman's Boot UNIONBAY Macon Grey Reputation first Online export store Extreme speed logistics,Sporto Womens Lori Leather Almond Toe Ankle Fashion Boots Taupe Size 8.0 lSgXHelly Hansen Bergen 6"Women's STCP WP Black/Blue Boot 8.5M,Steve Madden Womens 'Batttle' Strapped Knee-High Boot, Cognac, US 7.5,Marc Fisher Felissa Women's Boots Dark Blue,Women Ankle Boots Pointy Toe Zip High Stilettos Heels Suede Leather Casual Shoes,Gentlemen/Ladies Sexy Black Sequins Boot Size 10 Louis, elaborate Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad negotiationKelly & Katie Womens tessano Closed Toe Ankle Fashion Boots boreaux Size 8.0,Vintage White Mountain Womens Boots Size 8 Boho Western Brown Leather 14” Tall,Vince Camuto Womens venica Leather Open Toe Ankle, whiskey barrel, Size 6.5 46kH,New Jessica Simpson Darbey Bootie boots size 7.5,Womens Steve Madden Boots Eton White Knee High Tall Slouch White Leather 6.5,Chaps Camara Brown Women Boot Winter Shoe Size 7.5B Modern Style,

Join the IFS Mailing List

Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.

Institute for Family Studies

© 2018 Institute for Family Studies

Vince Camuto Camey Ankle Booties - Women's Size 8 M - Black,

Contact

Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902
 


610.733.4804

Media Inquiries

We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.

Media Kit

Support

Thanks for your interest in supporting the work of The Institute for Family Studies. Please mail support checks to the address below:

The Institute for Family Studies
P.O. Box 1502
Charlottesville, VA 22902

If you would like to donate online, please click the button below to be taken to our donation form:

Donate

You can also support us on Patreon via the button below:

IFS on Patreon

The Institute for Family Studies is a 501(c)3 organization. Your donation will be tax-deductible.